Langsung ke konten utama

Postingan

About Me

About Me

Some of my earliest memories are tied to books. I don’t remember specific titles from kindergarten, but I remember the feeling. Sitting still while my mind went somewhere else. Even then, reading felt less like a hobby and more like a doorway. I didn’t know how to explain it, only that words could carry weight far beyond the page. As I grew older, I didn’t gravitate toward easy or comforting books. I was drawn to writers like Fyodor Dostoevsky. His work doesn’t offer neat lessons or optimism wrapped in clean sentences. It deals with doubt, guilt, faith, cruelty, compassion, and the contradictions inside people. Reading him forced me to slow down and sit with discomfort. It taught me that understanding people is harder than judging them, and far more important. Reading wasn’t the only thing that shaped how I pay attention to the world. I’ve loved football since I was seven years old, and I’ve supported Manchester United for as long as I can remember. The beginning was almost stupidly si...
Postingan terbaru

Severence

  Severance  is not just a story about work-life balance. It is a story about what happens when comfort becomes confinement. The show feels like a perfectly maintained walled garden. Inside, everything is controlled, clean, and strangely peaceful. You are protected from the chaos outside. But the wall is taller than you think. By the time you notice it, you are already enclosed. The severance procedure splits one body into two conscious agents: the “innie” who exists only at work, and the “outie” who lives in the outside world. They share flesh, but not memory. They occupy the same life, but not the same reality. At first, the idea seems practical. Separate pain from productivity. Isolate trauma. Create efficiency. But over time, the original purpose shifts. The goalposts move quietly. What was meant to create balance begins to create obedience. The most disturbing part is not the office, or the strange rituals, or even Lumon itself. It is the fragmentation of identity. The in...

Money Heist

 Money Heist feels like a resistance story with a Robin Hood vibe, but what really makes it work is motivation. Each character joins the heist for a different reason, because they’re in different phases of life and different mental states when the Professor finds them. They might be on the same side, but they’re not chasing the same thing. The Professor is so effective because he notices that difference immediately. He understands what each person is missing, what they’re afraid of, and what they want to believe about themselves. He knows exactly what buttons to push, which emotions to trigger, and which story to sell so they’ll commit to something bigger than their own chaos. That’s why the “game” stays dynamic: it isn’t just strategy vs. police, it’s psychology vs. psychology inside the crew, too. Even the money fits that theme. Money only works because people agree it has value, so in a way it’s a shared fiction. The Professor treats it like that. He doesn’t just steal cash, he ...

Sucession

  Succession  was the show that exposed me to how simple and how complex family dynamics can be at the same time. Almost every character feels familiar, like someone we already know. They think like ordinary people, but their motives are made visible by wealth. Money doesn’t change them; it removes the need to hide. They can pretend to be friends, allies, even lovers, and discard those roles the moment they stop being useful. Intimacy is transactional, loyalty is temporary, and affection is just another tool. The relationships feel broad and layered because they mirror real human behavior, only amplified by power. Every child in the Roy family carries a sense of entitlement. It’s tempting to blame this on second-generation wealth, but the show suggests something more uncomfortable: entitlement isn’t inherited, it’s human. Wealth only gives it permission to act without consequences. Greg is the clearest example of this. He starts as harmless, almost pathetic, but his banality i...

Better call Saul

Better Call Saul hit me harder than Breaking Bad . Not because it’s louder or more shocking, but because it’s quieter. The characters feel more textured, more human, and I kept changing who I was rooting for as the story unfolded. That discomfort felt intentional, like the show was daring me to keep up. The transition from Jimmy to Saul doesn’t come from a single breaking point. It grows out of moral flexibility shaped by desperation. Jimmy keeps discovering that the world doesn’t reward people like him when they try to play fair. Saul isn’t a sudden betrayal of who he was. He’s what happens when survival matters more than dignity, and the mask eventually becomes the face. The relationship between Jimmy and Kim is the core wound of the series. They grow together, enable each other, and slowly split apart without ever fully letting go. Watching that collapse feels more tragic than any explosion or gunfight because it happens quietly, through small choices neither of them knows how ...

Game Of Thrones

  Game of Thrones is special to me because it was the show that taught me how to commit to long-form storytelling . Every new season felt like an event, something worth sacrificing sleep for, because the show demanded sustained attention and rewarded it. It wasn’t passive entertainment. It trained patience. The series makes its intentions clear early by executing the character who looks most like a traditional protagonist. Ned Stark’s death is not a twist for shock value. It is a declaration. Moral certainty does not protect you here. In this world, honor is not a shield. It is a weakness. From that moment on, the show forces the audience to abandon the comfort of rooting for a single “good” side. What follows is a story where no decision is private. Every personal choice immediately becomes a political act, whether the character wants it to or not. Love, loyalty, mercy, and pride all carry consequences far beyond intention. The characters are not opposing sides of a moral debat...

Friends

  Friends  is the kind of show I return to when I don’t know what to watch, usually alongside  Seinfeld . Not because it challenges me, but because it doesn’t ask much at all. It’s easy to consume, even with half my attention elsewhere, and that effortlessness is part of its comfort. The show doesn’t demand focus. It just keeps going, like background noise that occasionally lands a punchline. What makes  Friends  work isn’t only the jokes, but how uneven the characters are. Some are intentionally funny, some are funny without realizing it, and some are only funny because of how confidently wrong they are. That imbalance gives the show texture. Each character operates based on their own version of reality. A few of those reality maps are accurate. Most of them are deeply flawed. The humor often comes from watching these characters make decisions that feel completely reasonable to them and completely ridiculous to everyone else. They react, think, and act accordin...

Dark

 Dark Dark was my first exposure to time travel that refuses to be entertaining first and understandable second. The show demands full attention, not because it is confusing by accident, but because every detail becomes a cause for something later. Missing a scene does not just mean missing information. It means misunderstanding the future. I often had to rewatch moments to understand what the show was quietly setting in motion. What separates Dark from typical time-travel stories is its reliance on scientific logic rather than supernatural shortcuts. Time travel is treated less like magic and more like a closed system governed by rules, consequences, and inevitability. The butterfly effect is not theoretical here. Small decisions echo across generations, creating chaos that feels earned rather than dramatic. No action disappears. Everything returns. The cruelty of Dark lies in how time reshapes its characters. People do not grow wiser with age. They grow harder, more compromised, ...