Langsung ke konten utama

Sucession

 Succession was the show that exposed me to how simple and how complex family dynamics can be at the same time. Almost every character feels familiar, like someone we already know. They think like ordinary people, but their motives are made visible by wealth. Money doesn’t change them; it removes the need to hide.


They can pretend to be friends, allies, even lovers, and discard those roles the moment they stop being useful. Intimacy is transactional, loyalty is temporary, and affection is just another tool. The relationships feel broad and layered because they mirror real human behavior, only amplified by power.


Every child in the Roy family carries a sense of entitlement. It’s tempting to blame this on second-generation wealth, but the show suggests something more uncomfortable: entitlement isn’t inherited, it’s human. Wealth only gives it permission to act without consequences.


Greg is the clearest example of this. He starts as harmless, almost pathetic, but his banality is exactly what makes him dangerous. He survives by attaching himself to stronger figures, absorbing protection while offering nothing of substance in return. Over time, the parasite grows. Quietly, it becomes large enough to damage the house itself.


Succession works because it refuses to moralize. It doesn’t ask us to admire these people or hate them. It asks us to recognize them. Strip away the money, and what’s left is a family driven by fear, insecurity, and the need to win, even when winning means destroying the thing they’re fighting for.

Postingan populer dari blog ini

About Me

Some of my earliest memories are tied to books. I don’t remember specific titles from kindergarten, but I remember the feeling. Sitting still while my mind went somewhere else. Even then, reading felt less like a hobby and more like a doorway. I didn’t know how to explain it, only that words could carry weight far beyond the page. As I grew older, I didn’t gravitate toward easy or comforting books. I was drawn to writers like Fyodor Dostoevsky. His work doesn’t offer neat lessons or optimism wrapped in clean sentences. It deals with doubt, guilt, faith, cruelty, compassion, and the contradictions inside people. Reading him forced me to slow down and sit with discomfort. It taught me that understanding people is harder than judging them, and far more important. Reading wasn’t the only thing that shaped how I pay attention to the world. I’ve loved football since I was seven years old, and I’ve supported Manchester United for as long as I can remember. The beginning was almost stupidly si...

Inglourious Basterds

  Watching  Inglourious Basterds Without Moral Shelter The first time I watched  Inglourious Basterds , the feeling was already heavy before anything truly violent happened. Doom and gloom sit in the opening scene, especially through Hans Landa. Even before you understand who he is, you feel it. Something is wrong, and it’s not loud about it. Landa is intelligent, polite, and strangely silly. He smiles too much. He talks too easily. That silliness makes him more frightening, not less. It signals comfort. Control. He doesn’t rush because he doesn’t need to. He enjoys the conversation. Every question sounds casual, but none of them are. Every word is a test. The fear in that scene isn’t explosive. It’s suffocating. You’re trapped in the room with the characters, aware that intelligence itself has become the weapon. Violence hasn’t happened yet, but it already feels inevitable. And that inevitability is the horror. After that scene, the movie becomes more disturbing, not bec...

Seinfeld

The Ease of Mastery Watching Seinfeld now feels oddly refreshing, especially given how old it is. The year of release shows, the pacing is different, the world is smaller, but none of that weighs it down. If anything, it makes the show feel lighter. There’s no urgency to impress, no visible strain to be meaningful. It just exists, calmly confident in what it’s doing. What makes Seinfeld feel almost magical is how close it stays to everyday life. Not the dramatic parts, but the trivial ones people usually ignore or edit out. Minor annoyances. Social awkwardness. Petty logic. The show doesn’t inflate these moments into big statements. It simply places them under a microscope and lets their absurdity reveal itself. The humor feels natural because it’s already there in real life. The craft is invisible, and that’s the achievement. Nothing looks forced. The dialogue snaps without sounding rehearsed. The situations feel inevitable rather than constructed. You can tell the show is care...